WTF! ELECTORAL COMMISSIONER! WHY THE DOUBLE STANDARDS?

4081286-4x3-700x525_2 (1)

Dear Patilias Gamato,

As Chief Electoral Commissioner,

We demand to know why you have one standard for the University of Technology and another for the University of Papua New Guinea?

We want to know why is it contemptuous and illegal for UPNG to hold an electoral Commission supervised referendum and it is perfectly OK for Unitech to have a referendum.

Have you, as Electoral Commissioner, fallen under the charms and political pressure of the O’Neill-ocracy?

We want to know what the electoral commissioner is practicing double standards – One for Unitech and another for UPNG?

Has the Electoral Commissioner become another tool for the Prime Minister? Another puppet?

What’s happening? Tell us because we deserve to know!

It has become clear that the University Senate is biased. It is too timid to stand up against the master.

The electoral Commissioner has FAILED to do his job INDEPENDENTLY!

WHY THE DOUBLE STANDARDS?!!

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “WTF! ELECTORAL COMMISSIONER! WHY THE DOUBLE STANDARDS?

  1. WTF! ELECTORAL COMMISSIONER! WHY THE DOUBLE STANDARDS?

    Hello Gamato

    No, I just saw it in Auckland, NZ… I am here to meet the Electoral Commissioner after attending Electoral Commissioner’s workshop for heads of Elections in the Pacific at Nadi, Fiji.

    On the caption; (WTF! Electoral Commissioner, Why the Double Standard?

    My position is clear and its like this. PNG Electoral Commission is seeking legal advice from State Solicitor on whether PNG Electoral Commission can go ahead and conduct the Referendum for the students. Under the law, I can only conduct the elections for National and LLG Elections and Industrial elections.

    It does not say election or referendum for University students actions, unless it is specifically written into their Constitution. I have advised the caretaker Electoral Commissioner Mr. John Kalamoroh to seek advice from State Solicitors and that the State Solicitor must provide in writing to me as Electoral Commissioner so that I can use that to advise them. If the advice is ok to proceed with referendum, obviously we will conduct the referedum for them, no problems with that. I dont think this is double standard. It must be done legally and common sense must prevail at all times especially dealing with public issues as such.

    The student’s referendum in my view is not an industrial action rather more political against the Government so I need proper legal advice on this type of actions that they want to take from State Solicitor. I am in constant contact with my office. They are also waiting for the legal advice from State lawyers. John has advised the students when they went to seek our advice on Friday, 13th May 2016.

    Patilias Gamato
    Electoral Commissioner
    Auckland NZ

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s